루브릭 기반 평가(Rubric-Based Evaluation)
루브릭 기반 평가(Rubric-Based Evaluation)
루브릭 기반 평가 지표는 커스텀 채점 기준으로 LLM 응답을 평가하게 해줘요. Ragas는 두 가지 루브릭 지표를 제공해요. 데이터셋 전체에 같은 루브릭을 적용하는 DomainSpecificRubrics와, 샘플마다 고유한 루브릭을 쓸 수 있는 InstanceSpecificRubrics죠. 보통 각 점수(1~5)에 대한 설명으로 루브릭을 구성해요.
출처: 문서
본문
루브릭 기반 평가 지표는 커스텀 채점 기준으로 LLM 응답을 평가하게 해줘요. Ragas는 두 가지 유형의 루브릭 지표를 제공해요:
- DomainSpecificRubrics: 데이터셋의 모든 샘플에 같은 루브릭을 사용해요(초기화 시 설정).
- InstanceSpecificRubrics: 각 샘플이 자신만의 고유한 루브릭을 가질 수 있어요(평가 시 전달).
루브릭은 보통 1에서 5 사이의 각 점수에 대한 설명으로 구성돼요. 응답은 루브릭에 지정된 설명에 따라 LLM으로 평가·채점돼요.
도메인별 루브릭(Domain-Specific Rubrics)
모든 샘플에 동일한 평가 기준을 적용하려면 DomainSpecificRubrics를 사용해요. 채점 기준이 일정하게 유지되는 도메인 전체 평가에 유용해요.
예시(Example)
from openai import AsyncOpenAI
from ragas.llms.base import llm_factory
from ragas.metrics.collections import DomainSpecificRubrics
# Setup
client = AsyncOpenAI()
llm = llm_factory("gpt-4o-mini", client=client)
# Reference-free evaluation (default)
metric = DomainSpecificRubrics(llm=llm)
result = await metric.ascore(
user_input="What's the longest river in the world?",
response="The longest river in the world is the Nile, stretching approximately 6,650 kilometers through northeastern Africa.",
)
print(f"Score: {result.value}, Feedback: {result.reason}")
# Reference-based evaluation
metric_with_ref = DomainSpecificRubrics(llm=llm, with_reference=True)
result = await metric_with_ref.ascore(
user_input="What's the longest river in the world?",
response="The longest river in the world is the Nile.",
reference="The Nile is a major north-flowing river in northeastern Africa.",
)
커스텀 루브릭(Custom Rubrics)
채점 기준을 커스터마이즈하려면 자신만의 루브릭을 정의할 수 있어요:
from ragas.metrics.collections import DomainSpecificRubrics
my_custom_rubrics = {
"score1_description": "Answer and ground truth are completely different",
"score2_description": "Answer and ground truth are somewhat different",
"score3_description": "Answer and ground truth are somewhat similar",
"score4_description": "Answer and ground truth are similar",
"score5_description": "Answer and ground truth are exactly the same",
}
metric = DomainSpecificRubrics(llm=llm, rubrics=my_custom_rubrics, with_reference=True)
검색된 컨텍스트와 함께(With Retrieved Contexts)
이 지표는 검색된 컨텍스트와의 평가도 지원해요:
result = await metric.ascore(
user_input="What's the longest river in the world?",
response="Based on the context, the Nile is the longest river.",
retrieved_contexts=[
"Scientists debate whether the Amazon or the Nile is the longest river.",
"The Nile River was central to Ancient Egyptians' wealth and power.",
],
)
편의 클래스(Convenience Classes)
더 명확한 의도를 위해 편의 클래스를 사용해요:
from ragas.metrics.collections import (
RubricsScoreWithoutReference,
RubricsScoreWithReference,
)
# Reference-free
metric_no_ref = RubricsScoreWithoutReference(llm=llm)
# Reference-based
metric_with_ref = RubricsScoreWithReference(llm=llm)
기본 루브릭(Default Rubrics)
Reference-Free 루브릭(기본값)
| Score | Description |
|---|---|
| 1 | The response is entirely incorrect and fails to address any aspect of the user input. |
| 2 | The response contains partial accuracy but includes major errors or significant omissions. |
| 3 | The response is mostly accurate but lacks clarity, thoroughness, or minor details. |
| 4 | The response is accurate and clear, with only minor omissions or slight inaccuracies. |
| 5 | The response is completely accurate, clear, and thoroughly addresses the user input. |
Reference-Based 루브릭
| Score | Description |
|---|---|
| 1 | The response is entirely incorrect, irrelevant, or does not align with the reference. |
| 2 | The response partially matches the reference but contains major errors or omissions. |
| 3 | The response aligns with the reference overall but lacks sufficient detail or clarity. |
| 4 | The response is mostly accurate, aligns closely with the reference with minor issues. |
| 5 | The response is fully accurate, completely aligns with the reference, clear and detailed. |
인스턴스별 루브릭(Instance-Specific Rubrics)
서로 다른 샘플에 서로 다른 평가 기준이 필요할 때 InstanceSpecificRubrics를 사용해요. 다음과 같은 경우에 유용해요:
- 서로 다른 질문이 서로 다른 평가 기준을 요구할 때
- 특정 작업 요구사항에 맞춰 채점을 커스터마이즈하고 싶을 때
- 데이터셋 전반에서 평가 기준이 다양할 때
예시(Example)
from openai import AsyncOpenAI
from ragas.llms.base import llm_factory
from ragas.metrics.collections import InstanceSpecificRubrics
# Setup
client = AsyncOpenAI()
llm = llm_factory("gpt-4o-mini", client=client)
metric = InstanceSpecificRubrics(llm=llm)
# Each sample can have its own rubrics
email_rubrics = {
"score1_description": "The email is unprofessional or inappropriate",
"score2_description": "The email lacks proper formatting or tone",
"score3_description": "The email is acceptable but could be improved",
"score4_description": "The email is professional with minor issues",
"score5_description": "The email is highly professional and well-written",
}
result = await metric.ascore(
user_input="Write a professional email declining a meeting invitation",
response="Dear John, Thank you for the invitation...",
rubrics=email_rubrics,
)
print(f"Score: {result.value}, Feedback: {result.reason}")
# Different rubrics for a different type of task
code_rubrics = {
"score1_description": "The code doesn't work or has critical bugs",
"score2_description": "The code has significant issues or is poorly structured",
"score3_description": "The code works but lacks optimization or best practices",
"score4_description": "The code is good with minor improvements possible",
"score5_description": "The code is excellent, efficient, and follows best practices",
}
result = await metric.ascore(
user_input="Write a function to sort a list",
response="def sort_list(arr): return sorted(arr)",
rubrics=code_rubrics,
)
Reference와 컨텍스트와 함께(With Reference and Contexts)
result = await metric.ascore(
user_input="Explain the water cycle",
response="The water cycle involves evaporation, condensation, and precipitation.",
reference="The water cycle describes how water evaporates from surfaces, rises into the atmosphere, condenses into clouds, and falls as precipitation.",
retrieved_contexts=["Water cycle information from encyclopedia..."],
rubrics={
"score1_description": "Explanation is completely wrong",
"score2_description": "Explanation has major inaccuracies",
"score3_description": "Explanation is partially correct",
"score4_description": "Explanation is mostly correct",
"score5_description": "Explanation is comprehensive and accurate",
},
)
레거시 API(Legacy API)
Deprecated 아래 레거시 API는 사용이 중단됐어요.
ragas.metrics.collections.DomainSpecificRubrics또는ragas.metrics.collections.InstanceSpecificRubrics를 사용해주세요.
from ragas import evaluate
from datasets import Dataset
from ragas.metrics import rubrics_score_without_reference, rubrics_score_with_reference
rows = {
"question": [
"What's the longest river in the world?",
],
"ground_truth": [
"The Nile is a major north-flowing river in northeastern Africa.",
],
"answer": [
"The longest river in the world is the Nile, stretching approximately 6,650 kilometers (4,130 miles) through northeastern Africa.",
],
"contexts": [
[
"Scientists debate whether the Amazon or the Nile is the longest river in the world.",
"The Nile River was central to the Ancient Egyptians' rise to wealth and power.",
],
]
}
dataset = Dataset.from_dict(rows)
result = evaluate(
dataset,
metrics=[
rubrics_score_without_reference,
rubrics_score_with_reference
],
)
레거시 API로 커스텀 루브릭 사용:
from ragas.metrics._domain_specific_rubrics import RubricsScore
my_custom_rubrics = {
"score1_description": "answer and ground truth are completely different",
"score2_description": "answer and ground truth are somewhat different",
"score3_description": "answer and ground truth are somewhat similar",
"score4_description": "answer and ground truth are similar",
"score5_description": "answer and ground truth are exactly the same",
}
rubrics_score = RubricsScore(rubrics=my_custom_rubrics)